With the fire still raging we can see the discussion on the cause already flaming with the same intensity. This is strange. Normally after a disaster we sympathise with the dead, the people who lost loved ones and those who lost houses and other property. The last three years we start to omit this habit, and even when the disaster is striking discussions on the cause, the effectiveness of the authorities engulf our moment of mourning and empathy. This is wrong, simply because the cause of a disaster is almost always compound and complex and in the emergency phase we need all our focus on the emergency, working on who and what can be saved. Firemen were discredited while risking their lives, mayors held accountable for not interrupting foreign trips and the sexual preferences of professionals put in the open as if is relevant for their functioning. The reason for this simultaneous raging of anger with the disaster can be attributed to social media, but then, also three years ago, soci...